2010
DOI: 10.1080/02726343.2010.499065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Difference Delay Modeling for Two-Dimensional Transverse Magnetic Time-Domain Integral Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Substituting either of these approximations in to Eq. (3) and inverse transforming [2] results in a set of equations…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Substituting either of these approximations in to Eq. (3) and inverse transforming [2] results in a set of equations…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, much research has been done to improve the efficiency and stability of time domain integral equations (TDIEs) [1,2]. Despite the advances made due to this work, some problems remain extremely difficult to solve accurately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finite difference delay modeling (FDDM) has the potential to overcome these problems [ Lin and Weile , 2010a]. FDDM was introduced by Wang et al [2008] and Lin and Weile [2010b], and it works by approximating the Laplace domain variable s by a z domain finite difference. While the stability advantages of FDDM were discussed by Wang et al [2008] and Lin and Weile [2010b], this paper goes further by (1) applying the FDDM method to a two‐dimensional problem and (2) using the Nyström method for spatial discretization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%