2018
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201800794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Difference Implicit Modeling of Geological Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scalar field is obtained by: (1) setting to 0 the value of the samples in contact with the "salt" region and the base of sediments, (2) setting to 1 the value of the samples in contact with the "sediments" region, and (3) interpolating the intermediate values in the remainder of the "uncertain" region. In this paper, we use the finite difference-based interpolation method proposed by Irakarama et al [2018] to generate this scalar field.…”
Section: Generating Salt Boundary Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scalar field is obtained by: (1) setting to 0 the value of the samples in contact with the "salt" region and the base of sediments, (2) setting to 1 the value of the samples in contact with the "sediments" region, and (3) interpolating the intermediate values in the remainder of the "uncertain" region. In this paper, we use the finite difference-based interpolation method proposed by Irakarama et al [2018] to generate this scalar field.…”
Section: Generating Salt Boundary Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the common implicit modeling methods, there is the triangulation with linear interpolation [7], nearest neighbor [8], distance power inverse ratio method [9], linear interpolation [10], local polynomial [11], interpolation of radial basis function [12], spline interpolation [13], ordinary Kriging [14], indicator Kriging [15], universal Kriging [16], etc. Implicit modeling methods have been focused on and studied in the fields of digital terrain modeling [17,18], geological structure modeling [19,20], reservoir modeling [21], hydrogeological modeling [22] and ore body modeling [23][24][25], etc. Among them, three-dimensional implicit modeling of the ore body has become a research hotspot of mining scholars all over the world in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A version of DSI based on the Cartesian grid is introduced in [14]. The roughness factor is designed to minimize second directional derivatives of the implicit function using a finite difference approximation, and the implicit function is interpolated on the grid cells using a piecewise bilinear interpolation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The roughness factor in DSI is defined as a discrete operator [10]. In practice, this factor may take different forms depending on the chosen domain discretisation scheme [4], [8], [14]. Instead, another approach is to find a continuous operator based on physical arguments, and then discretise it accordingly [13], [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation