2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.01.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-difference method for incompressible Navier–Stokes equations in arbitrary orthogonal curvilinear coordinates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding Taylor microscale Reynolds numbers are Re λ = 50 and 110, respectively. The Navier-Stokes equations are solved with a finite differences scheme and with time advancement computed by a semi-implicit Runge-Kutta method (Nikitin 2006). The resolution is 256×256×256 grid points in x 1 , x 2 and x 3 direction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding Taylor microscale Reynolds numbers are Re λ = 50 and 110, respectively. The Navier-Stokes equations are solved with a finite differences scheme and with time advancement computed by a semi-implicit Runge-Kutta method (Nikitin 2006). The resolution is 256×256×256 grid points in x 1 , x 2 and x 3 direction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The infinitesimal partial motion of M with respect to axis, i.e., keeping constant the position of M from and axes, yields motion at M , where MM corresponds to the Mathematical Problems in Engineering 3 infinitesimal partial change of position r 0 given as the vector variation r 0 , where r 0 = i + j + k = cℎ 3 . The vector r 0 + r 0 defines the new location M of point M. Paying attention to the sketch in Figure 1, vectors r 0 and r 0 + r 0 can be described by the following relationships:…”
Section: Development Of a Curvilinear Orthogonal Coordinatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to integral methods with a curvilinear coordinate system, their advantage is the generalized possibility of applications and their disadvantage is the necessary more detailed validation, which is accompanied by longer computational times (from some hours to some days) and much more computer memory and power. Alternatively, depending on the selection of the solution procedure and in case that the specific particles are in curvilinear motion, the above equations may be preferable to be expressed at a curvilinear coordinate system [3]. Although, several buoyant jet phenomena can be analyzed by the governing equations written in orthogonal Cartesian or cylindrical coordinate systems [4][5][6][7][8], there exist some specific phenomena that the use of a curvilinear orthogonal coordinate system is mandatory [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These equations were numerically solved in a spherical coordinate system where the impermeability and noslip conditions for the azimuthal u φ , radial u r , and polar u θ components of the velocity have the form u φ (r = r 1,2 ) = Ω 1,2 (t)r 1,2 sinθ, u r (r = r 1,2 ) = 0, u θ (r = r 1,2 ) = 0, where subscripts 1 and 2 correspond to the inner and outer spheres, respectively. We used an algorithm of numerical solution [18] based on a conservative finite difference scheme of the discretization of the Navier-Stokes equations in space and semi-implicit Runge-Kutta scheme of the third order integration accuracy in time. Discretization in space was performed on grids nonuniform in r and θ directions with concentration near the boundaries and equatorial plane and the total number of nodes 5.76 × 10 5 .…”
Section: Methods Of Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%