1999
DOI: 10.1364/josab.16.000465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-difference time-domain calculation of spontaneous emission lifetime in a microcavity

Abstract: We developed a general numerical method to calculate the spontaneous emission lifetime in an arbitrary microcavity, using a finite-difference time-domain algorithm. For structures with rotational symmetry we also developed a more efficient but less general algorithm. To simulate an open radiation problem, we use absorbing boundaries to truncate the computational domain. The accuracy of this method is limited only by numerical error and finite reflection at the absorbing boundaries. We compare our result with c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
106
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For complicated geometries obtained after the top metal layer patterning, it is possible to use the FDTD-based 3-D analysis of Purcell factor proposed in [22]. However, this requires large amounts of computer memory.…”
Section: E Purcell Factor and Decay Rate Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For complicated geometries obtained after the top metal layer patterning, it is possible to use the FDTD-based 3-D analysis of Purcell factor proposed in [22]. However, this requires large amounts of computer memory.…”
Section: E Purcell Factor and Decay Rate Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation is based on the result that the quantum electrodynamical and classical treatments of SE emission yield proportional results, so that the SE rate is related to the classical dipole radiation power by Γ P C SE /Γ bulk SE = P P C classical /P bulk classical for bulk GaAs and the PC [11]. In these simulations, we replicated the conditions under which the experimental data were obtained: 200 dipoles were placed at random positions and orientations in a photonic crystal structure, roughly covering the focal size over which we collected in the experiment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And Xu et al [16] have also pointed out that the ratio of the decay rate can be substituted by the ratio of the power. Then, to determine the emission rates and directivity for various emitter antenna configurations, a general approach is only to calculate the electromagnetic field and the power distribution produced by a single emitter in proximity to a metallic nano-particle.…”
Section: Antenna Models and Computational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So SPPs can be used to control the radiation rate of the excitation and improve the quantum yield. In this respect, several theoretical and experimental realizations have been studied, such as emitters close to interface [11,12], nanospheres [13], nano-rings [14], inside cavities [15,16], and photonic crystals [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%