4th EEGS Meeting 1998
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201407229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-difference time-domain simulation of GPR data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, there is a set of mathematical methods, which is highly efficient and diverse with regard to the modelling of electromagnetic wave propagation, e.g. the method of moments [6,7], ray delineation method, with spectral or pseudo spectral methods [8][9][10][11][12][13], methods of differential expression resolutions of Maxwell equations such as differences and finite elements method [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. However, the modelling of the propagation in concrete is not possible without the modelling of the permittivity of the concrete.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Wave Propagation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is a set of mathematical methods, which is highly efficient and diverse with regard to the modelling of electromagnetic wave propagation, e.g. the method of moments [6,7], ray delineation method, with spectral or pseudo spectral methods [8][9][10][11][12][13], methods of differential expression resolutions of Maxwell equations such as differences and finite elements method [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. However, the modelling of the propagation in concrete is not possible without the modelling of the permittivity of the concrete.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Wave Propagation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GPR set of data was first ascertained using the Ground Vision program (MALA program for quick data illustration). As the resolution of GPR profiles can be enhanced by stacking over many traces or using post-processing software to effectively suppress unwanted noise (Chen and Huang, 1998), the complete GPR set of data was analysed using the REFLEX program for post-processing operations. Four processing steps were performed: static corrections for shifting the traces to zero ground level, background removal, gain adjustment in the y direction and band pass filter to remove the low-frequency bias from the traces.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, they can be classified into three approaches: differential equations, integral equations and simplified analytical solutions. The first approach discretizes the volume of the computational space into grids to find approximate numerical solutions of Maxwell’s equations using Finite‐Element Time‐Domain (FETD) (Chen and Huang ; Harutyunyan ; Durand and Slodicka ) or Finite‐Difference Time‐Domain (FDTD) models (Giannopoulos ; Ghasemi and Abrishamian ; Atteia and Hussein ; Warren and Giannopoulos ). However, these models have not been able to properly describe the actual radar data due to inherent discrepancies between the real and conceptualized antenna model configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%