1969
DOI: 10.1061/jmcea3.0001144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Dynamic Model for Infinite Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
360
1
13

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,899 publications
(376 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
360
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…8,10,12) and for ground story respect to base level (Figs. 9,11,13). The proportion between two responses of buildings built in Adapazari downtown and Maltepe soil conditions were illustrated to monitor the contribution of soil effect on the failure of RC moment resisting frame buildings (Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8,10,12) and for ground story respect to base level (Figs. 9,11,13). The proportion between two responses of buildings built in Adapazari downtown and Maltepe soil conditions were illustrated to monitor the contribution of soil effect on the failure of RC moment resisting frame buildings (Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some conditions where it is impossible to cover the unbounded soil domain with finite elements with bounded dimensions the Substructure Method is used as an alternative. Lysmer and Kuhlemyer [9] proposed a special frequency independent viscous dashpot boundary on the interface nodes in all directions.…”
Section: Methodology Of Ssi Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, G stands for the shear modulus, r for the distance from the source, E oed is the oedometric modulus and h is the depth of the foundation not being modelled. At all (non-fixed) boundaries damping coefficients of ρc p for normal and ρc s for tangential direction, as in [68][69][70][71] are used. Here, ρ is the density and c p , c s , are the velocity of propagation of pressure and shear waves, respectively.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper 0.75 m of the subgrade are represented in the model with brick elements, and the bottom 3 m are represented using an equivalent bi-dimensional viscoelastic Kelvin-Voigt foundation (Varandas, 2013). The lateral walls at the extremities of the model have local dampers to absorb impinging waves (Lysmer and Kuhlemeyer, 1969). The abutment back wall (at x 0.3 m and z < 0.0 m) and the bridge deck surface (at z 0.0 m and x > 0.3 m) were simulated using stiff spring elements in the normal directions to restrain the corresponding displacements.…”
Section: Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%