2020
DOI: 10.1177/0300060520903669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element analysis of a new plate for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures

Abstract: Background: A new plate for the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures was developed, and its biomechanical stability was analyzed by the finite element method. Method: Using 3-matic and UG-NX software, we constructed models of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures with angles of 50 , 60 , and 70 . Moreover, a new femoral neck plate (NFNP) fixation model and a Pauwels screw fixation model were developed. Under axial loads of 1400 N and 2100 N, von Mises stress (VMS) distribution on the screws, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main explanations relate to the lack of pressure perpendicular to the fracture line and presence of pressure at the parallel level, exerting a pulling force on the screw and predisposing the generation of a slip between the ends, allowing recurrent complications, such as the non-union of the fracture and varus deformity of the hip. 23 These findings are reinforced by previous studies, where the use of three cannulated screws in an inverted triangular configuration did not generate the necessary mechanical stability to treat femoral neck fractures, showing a significantly lower capacity to withstand maximum loads than an L-shaped fixation set with three screws. 15 Compared to the classical configuration of DHS and ASNIS, the DHS with anti-rotation screw, in the present study, was also superior in terms of the biomechanical variables evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The main explanations relate to the lack of pressure perpendicular to the fracture line and presence of pressure at the parallel level, exerting a pulling force on the screw and predisposing the generation of a slip between the ends, allowing recurrent complications, such as the non-union of the fracture and varus deformity of the hip. 23 These findings are reinforced by previous studies, where the use of three cannulated screws in an inverted triangular configuration did not generate the necessary mechanical stability to treat femoral neck fractures, showing a significantly lower capacity to withstand maximum loads than an L-shaped fixation set with three screws. 15 Compared to the classical configuration of DHS and ASNIS, the DHS with anti-rotation screw, in the present study, was also superior in terms of the biomechanical variables evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In a clinical study, Ye et al 36 also explored three cannulated screws augmented with a medial buttress plate for the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, and their results showed that this surgical method improved the fracture healing rate. In a recent study by Wang et al 37 , a new femoral neck plate with four screws (a 7.3-mm partially threaded cancellous compression screw, two 7.3-mm half-screw locking compression screws, and a 5-mm locking screw) was designed by an orthopedic surgeon and a design engineer, and they found that the new plate is superior to the Pauwels screw with regard to biomechanical stability in Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture models with three different fracture angles. Despite the many advantages of those studies, proximal femoral locking plates or a medial buttress plate with cannulated screws require a large surgical incision, which undoubtedly damages the surrounding tissue and impairs the blood supply of the femoral head.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We further tested and validated the two groups using biomechanical experiments with the fourthgeneration composite femur model, and the results showed that the femur deformation and fracture line displacement were signi cantly lower in the NCS group than in the CCS group, while the vertical stiffness was signi cantly higher than in the CCS group, which also con rmed that the xation effect of the NCS group was signi cantly better than that of the CCS group, both in the fatigue test (vertical load 0-1000 N) and in the static test (vertical load 1400 N, equivalent to 2 times the body weight). It may be related to the caudal nut of the new screw design, which is xed to the femoral cortex to provide angular stability and support the forces transmitted from the femoral head rather than compression, which can provide shear resistance and effectively prevent femoral neck shortening [25]. Also the upper 2 half-threaded screws still have a partial sliding pressure effect [26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%