2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element analysis of cracking and delamination of concrete beam due to steel corrosion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a reliable durability assessment of corroding RC structures, it is necessary to develop predictive models that consider the simultaneous effects of various environmental stressors [10,11]. Furthermore, the inherent nonlinear properties and time-dependent characteristics of the involved parameters must be taken into account at each step of analysis.…”
Section: Integration Of Random Fields Into Fe Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a reliable durability assessment of corroding RC structures, it is necessary to develop predictive models that consider the simultaneous effects of various environmental stressors [10,11]. Furthermore, the inherent nonlinear properties and time-dependent characteristics of the involved parameters must be taken into account at each step of analysis.…”
Section: Integration Of Random Fields Into Fe Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element method (FEM) shows that the cracking of concrete beams due to steel corrosion is caused by an increasing radial expansion of the corroded steel rebars. Beam cracking develops in four stages: internal cracking, internal penetration, external horizontal cracking, and external vertical cracking (Du et al, 2013). Combining DIP and FEM may be an alternative diagnostic tool to the electrochemical LPR and EIS techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the changes owing to damage are generally more significant than changes due to deterioration. Du et al 2 concluded that the undamaged surface of a concrete structure does not confirm its healthy condition. As a result, deterioration is much more difficult to detect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%