2020
DOI: 10.1111/os.12797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Analysis of Insertion Angle of Absorbable Screws for the Fixation of Radial Head Fractures

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the biomechanical effects of different insertion angles of absorbable screws for the fixation of radial head fractures. Methods: The finite element models used to simulate the fractures were created based on CT scans. Two absorbable screws were used to fix and maintain the stability of the fracture, and the angles between the screws were set to 0 , 15 , 30 , 45 , 60 , 75 , and 90. A downward force of 100 N was applied at the stress point, which was coupled with the surface, and the di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, Pomwenger et al ( 69) simulated a keeled versus pegged glenoid implant with a force of 650N for a flexion and abduction of 90° and the primary involving muscles of the scapula are m. trapezius, m. rhomboideus, m. deltoideus, m. serratus anterior and inferior at their insertion points on the scapular surface. It is similar happened in other parts such as the radius, where Xu et al (23) utilised two absorbable screws to fix the fracture and preserve its stability, with a vertical downward force of 100N at the stress point and seven possible angles of the two screws ranging from 0o to 90o. Based on these previous researches, the boundary conditions were chosen based on patient's condition and the values of specific forces that would be used to build the finite element model.…”
Section: Boundary and Load Conditionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, Pomwenger et al ( 69) simulated a keeled versus pegged glenoid implant with a force of 650N for a flexion and abduction of 90° and the primary involving muscles of the scapula are m. trapezius, m. rhomboideus, m. deltoideus, m. serratus anterior and inferior at their insertion points on the scapular surface. It is similar happened in other parts such as the radius, where Xu et al (23) utilised two absorbable screws to fix the fracture and preserve its stability, with a vertical downward force of 100N at the stress point and seven possible angles of the two screws ranging from 0o to 90o. Based on these previous researches, the boundary conditions were chosen based on patient's condition and the values of specific forces that would be used to build the finite element model.…”
Section: Boundary and Load Conditionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Finite Element Method (FEM) has been a popular method in orthopaedics research during the previous decade (23). The model of a complicated structure and geometry such as human bone and other engineering parts may be divided into a finite number of components using the FEM.…”
Section: Overview Of the Finite Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone tissues, ligaments, and implants all have linear‐elastic material properties. Since the focus of this study is not to predict the mechanical behavior of implants, isotropic linear‐elastic material models can be used to simulate the preyield mechanical behavior 41 , 42 . Many FEA studies of the lumbar spine have assumed that the components of the spine are linear to simplify the calculations 43 , 44 , 45 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was approved by the ethics committee of the local institution, and written informed consent was obtained from the participants. This model was validated in our previous research (28). The surface grid editing tool in Geomagic 2013 software was used to analyze the 3D models of each part of the elbow.…”
Section: Methods 3d Elbow Joint Model Establishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%