2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Analysis of the Effect of Dynamic Plating on Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion Biomechanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Screw loosening generally increased as the plate length increased [52]. Micromotion and subsidence are lessened by rotational dynamic plating, yet too much tolerance for rotational freedom in the screws eventually becomes detrimental [53]. Segmental plating decreased the chance of screw pullout postsurgery [54].…”
Section: Spine Hardwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screw loosening generally increased as the plate length increased [52]. Micromotion and subsidence are lessened by rotational dynamic plating, yet too much tolerance for rotational freedom in the screws eventually becomes detrimental [53]. Segmental plating decreased the chance of screw pullout postsurgery [54].…”
Section: Spine Hardwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous works, we successfully developed a complex 3D FEA model in the cervical spine (Lin et al, 2021;Lin et al, 2022a;Lin et al, 2022b;Lin et al, 2023), thereby confirming the accurate representation of ligaments, nucleus pulposus, and annulus through solid modeling. In this study, we extended our model to the lumbar spine and focused on a section of the lumbar spine and did a comparative FEA on common treatments for spinal stenosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Because the physiological curvature of the cervical spine is anteriorly convex and loads on the anterior spine are eccentric relative to the posterior spine ( Zhang et al, 2022b ), the failure loads were related to many factors, such as the applied high tensile strains ( Fields et al, 2010 ), bone–end plate contact area or cage shape ( Tan et al, 2005 ), and bone mineral density (BMD) or cage placement ( Labrom et al, 2005 ). Lin et al (2021 , 2022) determined subsidence by measuring the distance that penetrated both the cage and screw into the end plate bone. Therefore, it is necessary to adopt a more rational and individual approach in estimating the maximum stress to failure loads, and we aim to perform relevant targeted optimizations in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%