2018
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element analysis of the influence of three‐joint spinal complex on the change of the intervertebral disc bulge and height

Abstract: This study evaluated the changes of height and bulging occurring in individual layers of the annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc for 3 load scenarios (axial compression, flexion, and extension). The numerical model of a single motion segment of the thoracic spine was analysed for 2 different configurations, ie, for the model of a physiological segment and a segment with the posterior column removed. In the physiological segment, all annulus fibrosus layers decrease in height regardless of the applied l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two main modeling trends can be distinguished in biomechanics: finite element method (FEM) and multibody system method (MBS). In the FEM models, such as in the work of [8], the components of the system are described as deformable structures composed of multiple finite elements. These models tend to describe the structures very accurately, both in terms of geometry and material behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two main modeling trends can be distinguished in biomechanics: finite element method (FEM) and multibody system method (MBS). In the FEM models, such as in the work of [8], the components of the system are described as deformable structures composed of multiple finite elements. These models tend to describe the structures very accurately, both in terms of geometry and material behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In actual conditions, the foregoing translates into the diversified distribution of loads affecting intervertebral discs. Scientific information concerning spinal biomechanics and results of computeraided simulations by Joszko et al [7] and Szkoda-Poliszuk et al [21] justify the conclusion that the pelvic retroposition, imposing the straightening of the lower part of the lumbar segment of the spine, is responsible for the uniform loading of intervertebral discs and for the asymmetric loading of intervertebral discs in terms of the pelvic anteversion. In spite of the positive effect resulting from the straightening of the spine, it is necessary to pay attention to the generation of high values of reaction forces in the intervertebral joints being 1.5 times higher than those generated when the pelvic inclination angle amounted to 16°, whereas the lowest value (0.59 BW) was obtained for segment L5-S1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Facet joints were assumed to be surface to surface. The material properties were assumed to be homogeneous and isotropic, the corresponding data were given in Table 1 33‐37 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material properties were assumed to be homogeneous and isotropic, the corresponding data were given in Table 1. [33][34][35][36][37] The intact L1-L5 spine FE model was modified to simulate the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) at L4-L5 lumbar level. The reason for choosing TLIF and the L4-L5 level is that TLIF may decrease the risks of the complications and provide better biomechanical stability, 38,39 and the prevalence of L4-L5 in individuals suffering from lumbar diseases is greater than other intervertebral disks.…”
Section: Fe Modeling and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%