2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12666-022-02720-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Analysis on AISI 316L Stainless Steel Exposed to Ball-on-Flat Dry Sliding Wear Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To analyze industrial metal-forming processes, numerical modeling and simulations based on the FEM (Finite Element Method) or FVM (Finite Volume Method) [42,43] are very often used, because from numerical modeling results, we can obtain a lot of very important and hard-to-determine (through experience) technological parameters, as well as different physical values/variables. Currently, such computational packages (Forge, Simufact, QForm) allow for quick analyses of the entire industrial process, e.g., determining the distribution of temperatures, stresses, forging forces, flow errors of the deformed material, and many other technological aspects [44,45]. Furthermore, by using new, special functions verified in industrial conditions, they even allow for the detection of flaws, like overlapping folds or trapped "pressure pockets", and compare numerical results and z-nominal CAD models [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze industrial metal-forming processes, numerical modeling and simulations based on the FEM (Finite Element Method) or FVM (Finite Volume Method) [42,43] are very often used, because from numerical modeling results, we can obtain a lot of very important and hard-to-determine (through experience) technological parameters, as well as different physical values/variables. Currently, such computational packages (Forge, Simufact, QForm) allow for quick analyses of the entire industrial process, e.g., determining the distribution of temperatures, stresses, forging forces, flow errors of the deformed material, and many other technological aspects [44,45]. Furthermore, by using new, special functions verified in industrial conditions, they even allow for the detection of flaws, like overlapping folds or trapped "pressure pockets", and compare numerical results and z-nominal CAD models [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zabala B [12] compared the simulation model with experimental results and found a difference of less than 5%, thus verifying the reliability of the simulation. Many researchers adopted the modified Archard wear model in friction and wear simulations to predict various parameters [13][14][15][16][17][18]. For instance, Bortoleto E M [19] employed the linear Archard wear theory and finite element method (FEM) in pin-on-disc dry sliding tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, many efforts have been made to develop FE simulation strategies for wear prediction. Recently, many authors [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] have proposed and utilized an FE iterative approach to update the contact geometries with each wear step. The contact pressure and sliding distance are also altered accordingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wear was calculated by a change in the element height of contact surfaces and re-meshing of the worn out geometry was applied using this approach. Later, the UMESHMOTION subroutine in conjunction with the adaptive mesh technique was utilized by authors [18][19][20][21][22] to simulate the material removal in sliding contact. This subroutine utilizes the contact solution data to execute the corresponding nodal displacement followed by re-meshing the contact geometries using adaptive mesh constraints in ABAQUS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%