2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element analysis on failure of reinforced concrete corner in sewage tank under opening bending moment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second problem consists in the non-linear inelastic response of the RC beam-column joint (see Figure 9), with important plastic strains that can lead to the soft story mechanism in current engineering practice. In the research paper of Khan et al [44],"the need to consider the shear hinge in RC beamcolumn joints" is confirmed, such that "the model has different stiffness degradation in tension and compression" [14].…”
Section: Global Analytical Results Regarding Pushover Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second problem consists in the non-linear inelastic response of the RC beam-column joint (see Figure 9), with important plastic strains that can lead to the soft story mechanism in current engineering practice. In the research paper of Khan et al [44],"the need to consider the shear hinge in RC beamcolumn joints" is confirmed, such that "the model has different stiffness degradation in tension and compression" [14].…”
Section: Global Analytical Results Regarding Pushover Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all analytical studies, as in this research paper, "stress-strain curves for concrete and steel reinforcement with graphical representation of cyclic uniaxial concrete compression/ tension, biaxial compressive failure and tensile failure consideration laws for concrete, bilinear with hardening law for steel reinforcement, cycling steel reinforcement model and steel reinforcement bond model" [12][13][14], were used, in order to obtain correct analytical results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned before, FEM calculations were performed with Abaqus software [ 28 ] using the Concrete Damaged Plasticity model (CDP) for concrete. There are many other alternative models, e.g., presented in the work Marzec et al [ 15 ] or Cichoń and Winnicki [ 29 , 30 ]. The CDP model for monotonic loading was mathematically formulated by Lubliner et al [ 31 ] and enhanced by Lee and Fenves [ 32 , 33 ] for dynamic and cyclic loading.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example distributions of cracks and failure forms are presented in the works of Johansson [ 13 ] and Starosolski [ 14 ]. Some recent results concerning reinforced concrete corners are presented in the works of Marzec [ 15 ], Wang [ 16 ], Berglund and Holström [ 17 ], Getachew [ 18 ], Haris and Roszevak [ 19 ], Abdelwahed [ 20 ], and Abdelwahed et al [ 21 ]. They describe laboratory tests, strut-and-tie method approaches, and numerical simulations in various FEM software (e.g., Athena, VecTor2, LS-Dyna).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it simplifies complex crack interactions, it may sacrifice the accuracy of capturing fine-scale crack patterns. Despite this trade-off, the smeared crack approach remains a valuable tool for conducting large-scale fracture analyses and optimizing designs [35]. The selecting e elements types, contact details, the used material models, and selecting the analysis type, which considered the displacement control type.…”
Section: Numerical Idealizationmentioning
confidence: 99%