2010
DOI: 10.1137/080731542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Approximations for Stokes–Darcy Flow with Beavers–Joseph Interface Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
89
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This condition relates the tangential velocity along the interface with the fluid stresses, that is, (12) αu f · τ + τ · σ f · n = 0 on Γ, where α is a parameter which needs to be experimentally determined and depends on the properties of the porous medium. An alternative to this third interface condition neglects the second term in (12), giving rise to a no-slip interface condition, (13) u f · τ = 0 on Γ.…”
Section: Free-flow Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This condition relates the tangential velocity along the interface with the fluid stresses, that is, (12) αu f · τ + τ · σ f · n = 0 on Γ, where α is a parameter which needs to be experimentally determined and depends on the properties of the porous medium. An alternative to this third interface condition neglects the second term in (12), giving rise to a no-slip interface condition, (13) u f · τ = 0 on Γ.…”
Section: Free-flow Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The derivation above indicates that the interface boundary conditions (except for the three obtained via conservation of mass consideration) are in fact variational interface boundary conditions. In the one phase case, Onsager's variation principle reduces to Helmholtz's minimal dissipation principle, and these interface boundary conditions reduce to the well-known Beavers-Joseph-Saffman-Jones interface boundary conditions that have been used in groundwater study and blood filtration [11,13,14,15,19,62,64,65,71,72,73,74]. The Beavers-Joseph-Saffman-Jones type interface boundary conditions can be also derived via homogenization consideration under appropriate assumptions [75] in the one phase case.…”
Section: Application Of Onsager's Extremum Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last velocity interface boundary condition is exactly the Beavers-Joseph-SaffmanJones interface boundary condition [10,12,14,15,60,61,62,63,64,65] with the slip coefficient β equal to the Beavers-Joseph-Saffman-Jones coefficient α BJSJ . The Cahn-Hilliard-Stokes system can be viewed as the low Reynolds number approximation of the better-known Cahn-Hilliard-Navier-Stokes system for two phase flow [28,35,34,36,40,66,67,68,69,70].…”
Section: Application Of Onsager's Extremum Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The convergence we have shown here is not associated with any rate. In [5], the convergence rates of finite element approximations to the time-dependent Stokes-Darcy problem are discussed.…”
Section: The Time Dependent Coupled Stokes-darcy Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a convergence rate is not given here. We consider convergence rates for finite element approximation in [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%