2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element-based optimisation of an elastomeric honeycomb for impact mitigation in helmet liners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such quasi-continuum structures, either with small unit cells or large external dimensions, would be more complex to make and test, respectively. While these may not be commercially viable, development of the underlying theory remains important, with implications for the analysis of biological tissue [30,31], composites [32][33][34], other lattices or mechanical metamaterials [59][60][61], or foams where twisting occurs within cells (rather than externally) [62]. Conversely, testing such materials may provide another option to develop the theory, although with less twist the effect sizes would be smaller, placing greater requirements on experimental accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such quasi-continuum structures, either with small unit cells or large external dimensions, would be more complex to make and test, respectively. While these may not be commercially viable, development of the underlying theory remains important, with implications for the analysis of biological tissue [30,31], composites [32][33][34], other lattices or mechanical metamaterials [59][60][61], or foams where twisting occurs within cells (rather than externally) [62]. Conversely, testing such materials may provide another option to develop the theory, although with less twist the effect sizes would be smaller, placing greater requirements on experimental accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific energy absorption of the MDRH structure is much higher than that of the TRH structure at all impact velocities, which indicates that the MDRH structure has a better energy absorption capacity per unit mass than the TRH structure. This implies that the MDRH is more reasonable and economically efficient [50,51].…”
Section: Plateau Stress and Specific Energy Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pre-buckled honeycomb structure was optimised using a finite element-based strategy [51]. A periodic boundary condition (PBC) model was adopted to approximate the response to impact loading, avoiding the computational cost associated with successive simulations of a full-scale honeycomb helmet configuration.…”
Section: Finite Element-based Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we report on the same, pre-buckled honeycomb with variable out-of-plane behaviour, for use in head protection. Here we utilise a previously reported finite-element based strategy for the optimisation of cellular structures, subject to multi-impact loading conditions [51]. Whilst most studies focus on single-use conventional honeycombs derived from metals and rigid polymer, an elastomeric material definition is used which affords recoverability, suited for helmet applications requiring energy absorption across consecutive impacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%