2002
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.2001.3804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Formulation and Active Vibration Control Study on Beams Using Smart Constrained Layer Damping (Scld) Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equations are then converted into an equivalent set of equations in the time domain that bears a standard dynamics form without any convolution integrals. The GHM method was used successfully by Balamurugan and Narayanan [21,22] in the transient finite element analysis of Timoshenko beams possessing viscoelastic layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equations are then converted into an equivalent set of equations in the time domain that bears a standard dynamics form without any convolution integrals. The GHM method was used successfully by Balamurugan and Narayanan [21,22] in the transient finite element analysis of Timoshenko beams possessing viscoelastic layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barkanov [24] used finite element analysis software to simulate the transient response of viscoelastic materials. Balamurugan et al [25] elucidated the suppression and control of vibration using smart constrained layer damping (SCLD). Liu et al [26] proposed active CLD and piezoelectrically induced active vibrations to enhance CLD performance, thereby inhibiting the vibration of a motherboard.…”
Section: Journal Of Mechanical Design and Vibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A SCLD with sufficiently large shear modulus (related to k) could outperform both PCLD and purely active configurations. large values of k were difficult to achieve and maintain in most viscoelastic materials, a compro mise had to be made in the choice of suitable k keeping in mind that SCLD designs were more reliable, robust and fail-safe when co mpared to purely active designs [2] .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%