2021
DOI: 10.5937/fme2103615n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element model of circularly curved Timoshenko beam for in-plane vibration analysis

Abstract: Curved beams are used so much in the arches and railway bridges and equipments for amusement parks. There are few reports about the curved beam with the effects of both the shear deformation and rotary inertias. In this paper, a new finite element model investigates to analyze In-Plane vibration of a curved Timoshenko beam. The Stiffness and mass matrices of the curved beam element was obtained from the force-displacement relations and the kinetic energy equations, respectively. Assembly of the elemental prope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A simple-supported curved box girder bridge was taken as the research object; the main parameters were as follows: calculated span L = 24.0 m, girder radius R = 100.0 m, elastic modulus E = 3.250 × 1010 N/m 2 , shear modulus G = 1.350 × 1010 N/m 2 , and density ρ = 2600 kg/m 3 . The main girder's cross-section was a single box single chamber with a cross-sectional area of A = 4.392 m 2 , a cross-sectional moment of inertia I y = 2.443 m 4 , I z = 20.721 m 4 , and a free torsional moment of inertia J = 5.042 m 4 . The main girder section is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Verification Of Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A simple-supported curved box girder bridge was taken as the research object; the main parameters were as follows: calculated span L = 24.0 m, girder radius R = 100.0 m, elastic modulus E = 3.250 × 1010 N/m 2 , shear modulus G = 1.350 × 1010 N/m 2 , and density ρ = 2600 kg/m 3 . The main girder's cross-section was a single box single chamber with a cross-sectional area of A = 4.392 m 2 , a cross-sectional moment of inertia I y = 2.443 m 4 , I z = 20.721 m 4 , and a free torsional moment of inertia J = 5.042 m 4 . The main girder section is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Verification Of Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The setting of the bridge deck superelevation and the existence of centrifugal force make the radial vibration of the vehicle-bridge coupling system along the curve aspects that cannot be ignored. The coupling relationship of curved girder bridges is more complex than that of straight bridges [4,5]. There are many studies on the coupling vibration of vehicles and bridges in straight bridges [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nadi A et al [13] proposed a finite element method for analyzing in-plane vibrations of Timoshenko curved beams. They derived the stiffness matrix and mass matrix of a curved beam element, considering shear deformation and rotational inertia, based on the force-displacement relationship and kinetic energy theorem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%