Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been applied in numerous scientific studies over the past decade. However, the possibility to apply tDCS in therapy of neuropsychiatric disorders is still debated. While transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been approved for treatment of major depression in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), tDCS is not as widely accepted. One of the criticisms against tDCS is the lack of spatial specificity. Focality is limited by the electrode size (35 cm2 are commonly used) and the bipolar arrangement. However, a current flow through the head directly from anode to cathode is an outdated view. Finite-element (FE) models have recently been used to predict the exact current flow during tDCS. These simulations have demonstrated that the current flow depends on tissue shape and conductivity. To face the challenge to predict the location, magnitude, and direction of the current flow induced by tDCS and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), we used a refined realistic FE modeling approach. With respect to the literature on clinical tDCS and tACS, we analyzed two common setups for the location of the stimulation electrodes which target the frontal lobe and the occipital lobe, respectively. We compared lateral and medial electrode configuration with regard to their usability. We were able to demonstrate that the lateral configurations yielded more focused stimulation areas as well as higher current intensities in the target areas. The high resolution of our simulation allows one to combine the modeled current flow with the knowledge of neuronal orientation to predict the consequences of tDCS and tACS. Our results not only offer a basis for a deeper understanding of the stimulation sites currently in use for clinical applications but also offer a better interpretation of observed effects.

Prophylactic treatment in menstrual migraine: A proof-of-concept study

“…Using this electrode montage parietal and occipital cortices show strong current densities in the range of 0.05-0.15 A/m 2 and they are stronger in medial than in lateral occipital cortex. According to a modeling study these electrode positions seems well suited for visual cortex stimulation [40]. A constant current of 2 mA intensity was applied for 20 min, including 20 s ramp-up and down phases.…”

Does 10-Hz cathodal oscillating current of the parieto-occipital lobe modulate target detection?

“…The electrodes were attached to the head underneath an EEG Recording Cap (EASYCAP, Herrsching, Germany) with the cathodal electrode (where the current was applied) at Oz and the anodal electrode placed at Cz. These positions were chosen for maximal stimulation intensity in the parieto-occipital cortex (Neuling et al, 2012b). The stimulation current had a rounded square waveform that was delivered at a 10-Hz frequency.…”

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function

“…NEBS electrode size or montage may impact cortical areas adjacent to the region of interest, resulting in limited focality of the stimulation itself 45,46 . Smaller electrode sizes (emitting electrode in case of tDCS) may limit the widespread and exert more focal effects onto M1, as suggested by modeling studies or software tools; similarly, less distance between electrodes may condense the electrical field 46,47 .…”