2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78187-7_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Model Updating of a Long Span Suspension Bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. In this study, the bridge is modelled with n m = 19 vibration modes from a FE model [25,26]. Fig.…”
Section: Data From the Hardanger Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2. In this study, the bridge is modelled with n m = 19 vibration modes from a FE model [25,26]. Fig.…”
Section: Data From the Hardanger Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Errors in the FE-based state-space model could give some incorrect estimates. Although the model is tuned [25], some temperature variations could affect the still-air natural frequencies and damping and thus also slightly the graphs in Fig. 9 and 10.…”
Section: Assessment Of Effective Modal Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covariance-driven stochastic subspace identification (Cov-SSI) is used to estimate the true natural frequencies (ω j ), damping ratios (ξ j ) and mode shapes (φ j ) of the bridge in operational conditions with low wind velocity (3-6 m/s) so that still-air modal properties is a fair approximation; see [29] for details. It is assumed that the effect of small time-variations in the modal properties due to for example changes in temperature can be neglected.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FE model is calibrated in a classic sensitivity-based model updating scheme [29], with the objective of matching the mode shapes and natural frequencies of the model to the identified ones. Herein, the following model parameters are adjusted: the densities and elastic stiffnesses of the girder, towers and main cable; the non-structural mass on the girder; the shear stiffness of the girder; the hanger tension; and spring-elastic stiffnesses representing the bearings in the girder-tower connection.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increasing establishment of SHM systems on bridge structures and the considerable improvement in numerical models that can be obtained from model updating, applications on several case studies are reported in the literature. These studies include applications on highway and railway bridges (Deng & Cai, 2010;Feng & Feng, 2015;Frøseth, R€ onnquist, & Øiseth, 2016;Jaishi & Ren, 2005;Ribeiro, Calçada, Delgado, Brehm, & Zabel, 2012;Sanayei, Phelps, Sipple, Bell, & Brenner, 2012;Schlune, Plos, & Gylltoft, 2009;Zordan, Briseghella, & Liu, 2014), footbridges (Naranjo-P erez, Jim enez-Alonso, Pavic, & S aez, 2020;Pavic, Hartley, & Waldron, 1998), cable-stay bridges (Asgari, Osman, & Adnan, 2013;Benedettini & Gentile, 2011;Ding & Li, 2008;Z arate & Caicedo, 2008;Zhang, Chang, & Chang, 2001;Zhong, Zong, Niu, Liu, & Zheng, 2016;Zhu, Xu, & Xiao, 2015), suspension and floating bridges (Hong, Ubertini, & Betti, 2011;Merce, Doz, de Brito, Macdonald, & Friswell, 2007;Petersen & Øiseth, 2017Petersen & Øiseth, , 2019, and relevant test structures (Sanayei, Khaloo, Gul, & Catbas, 2015;Zapico, Gonz alez, Friswell, Taylor, & Crewe, 2003;Zhang, Chang, & Chang, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%