2005
DOI: 10.1155/2005/581634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Model Updating Using FRF Measurements

Abstract: This study presents a new updating method based on measured frequency response functions. The objective function of the minimization procedure is formed by the difference between the measured and the analytical frequency responses. The updating parameters are the correction coefficients related to each the elementary mass and stiffness matrices. While making use of a number of incomplete measurements for some frequencies, one builds a non-linear system of equations. The linearisation of the numerical system le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the structures are designated through finite element method (FEM) by engineers, and the developed model must be updated using the responses of the constructed structure. For this purpose, many model‐updating methods are available . Roemer and Mook utilized a time‐domain technique to accurately identify the mass, stiffness, and damping matrices from noisy measurements .…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the structures are designated through finite element method (FEM) by engineers, and the developed model must be updated using the responses of the constructed structure. For this purpose, many model‐updating methods are available . Roemer and Mook utilized a time‐domain technique to accurately identify the mass, stiffness, and damping matrices from noisy measurements .…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using least squares algorithm to solve the overdetermined equation (17) of the spindle model correcting algorithm, the residual error stabilized after 30 iterations. The variation tendencies of the updated parameters, including the translational stiffness 11 , coupled stiffness 12 , and the rotational stiffness 22 of the joint surface, are respectively depicted in Figures 5(a), 5(b), and 5(c).…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differently, the FRF-based model updating methods make use of the measured FRFs directly which circumvent the need to identify the modal parameters from the experiments [12][13][14][15][16][17]. These methods are able to produce highly accurate updated system matrices through iteration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other sensitivity‐based methods have been developed for FRF model updating such as that of Asma and Bouazzouni , which uses analytical sensitivities of the element stiffness and mass matrices to determine damage, and that of Fritzen et al . , which uses state space formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other sensitivity-based methods have been developed for FRF model updating such as that of Asma and Bouazzouni [14], which uses analytical sensitivities of the element stiffness and mass matrices to determine damage, and that of Fritzen et al [15], which uses state space formulation. More recently, Esfandiari et al [16] developed another analytical sensitivity-based method that is based on changes to elemental stiffness and mass properties at the element level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%