IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2004.1417691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element modeling of ultrasonic separation at the microscale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These distributions obtained from numerical simulation well agree with the results obtained from analytic solutions. 16) One of the advantages of the numerical approach is its easy adoption of symmetry breaking in the device structure such as ellipticity of the tube cross-section and non-uniform density of fluid along the tube.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These distributions obtained from numerical simulation well agree with the results obtained from analytic solutions. 16) One of the advantages of the numerical approach is its easy adoption of symmetry breaking in the device structure such as ellipticity of the tube cross-section and non-uniform density of fluid along the tube.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the acoustic force along the transverse (y) direction can be strongly dependent on frequency. 16) Another important factor influencing the magnitude of the acoustic force is the size of the particles. The force is proportional to the cubic of particle radius (R) as shown in Eq.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation