2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element modelling of a historic church structure in the context of a masonry damage analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical analysis carried out is intended to compare in a simplified way the static schemes and load transfer between medieval and modern roof trusses. The studies described in [40,41] were used to implement the wood input parameters. The following wood parameters were included in the model: longitudinal compressive strength XC = 62.…”
Section: Medieval Bourgeois Tenement House In Gdańskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical analysis carried out is intended to compare in a simplified way the static schemes and load transfer between medieval and modern roof trusses. The studies described in [40,41] were used to implement the wood input parameters. The following wood parameters were included in the model: longitudinal compressive strength XC = 62.…”
Section: Medieval Bourgeois Tenement House In Gdańskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the modelling features outlined above, EL3 assessment can be based on linear or nonlinear analysis and different load types (static or dynamic). Examples of different approaches can be found, among other, in [63,64,[82][83][84] The most common strategies in this field are static nonlinear analyses (i.e., pushoveranalyses). With pushover analyses, structures are subjected to increasing horizontal loads until failure, considering both a mass-proportional and modal-proportional distribution.…”
Section: Types Of Analysis and Typical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With reference to masonry representation, it can be certainly asserted that the macromodelling approach is the most adopted one for masonry churches [60][61][62][63][64]. With such an approach, units and joints are not individually modelled, but the material is represented as an equivalent homogeneous continuum, and thus computational efficiency is attained at the expenses of some simplifications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aforementioned causes of complex geometry require special attention when modelling these structural elements and their connections. The complexity of finite elements and the ways in which they can be connected, as well as the modelling of connections, have been addressed in several studies [35][36][37][38]. Although for some buildings there is no project documentation, nowadays the geometry is not a major problem, as there are several modern methods that can be used to determine the geometry very easily [39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%