2004
DOI: 10.1088/0965-0393/12/5/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-element modelling of non-destructive material evaluation, an addendum: a bibliography (1997–2003)

Abstract: This paper gives a bibliographical review of the finite-element methods applied to the non-destructive evaluation of materials. It is a continuation of the same paper published in Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. 7 (1999) 107-145. The bibliography at the end of this paper contains references to papers, conference proceedings and theses/dissertations on the subject that were published between 1997 and 2003. The following topics are included: electrical, magnetic and electromagnetic methods; sonic methods; mechanic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 572 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several non-destructive testing (NDT) methods available, including optical [21], compliance [22,23], ultrasonic [24,25], acoustic emission [26][27][28], eddy current [27][28][29], alternating current field [30][31][32][33], and potential difference (PD) methods. All have associated advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several non-destructive testing (NDT) methods available, including optical [21], compliance [22,23], ultrasonic [24,25], acoustic emission [26][27][28], eddy current [27][28][29], alternating current field [30][31][32][33], and potential difference (PD) methods. All have associated advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, the prediction of the scattered waves is highly challenging because of the existence of multiple dispersive modes of Lamb waves at any frequency along with mode conversion at the damage location. Therefore, welldeveloped numerical methods such as the finite element method (FEM) and the boundary element method (BEM) have been popular (Cho and Rose, 2000;Gal an and Abascal, 2005;Mackerle, 2004;Moser et al, 1999). However, commercial FEM codes are time consuming and they do not provide much insight of the wave field in the structure, especially near the damage location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the analytical computation of wave propagation in damaged anisotropic material is nearly impossible, it is necessary to improve current numerical techniques. Many of these methods are currently under investigation: The finite element method (FEM) [1,2], the boundary element method (BEM), the spectral element method (SEM) [3] or the finite difference method (FDM). Here, the SFEM is under investigation which originates from the computational analysis in geophysics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%