2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2022.103816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element periodic catenary model to perform HIL pantograph tests considering non-linear dropper behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the periodic finite element model catenary presented in [ 27 ] was tested as explained, showing low error and, thus, validating the HIL simulation setup. Figure 8 shows a comparison of the contact force for a span between the simulation and the test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the periodic finite element model catenary presented in [ 27 ] was tested as explained, showing low error and, thus, validating the HIL simulation setup. Figure 8 shows a comparison of the contact force for a span between the simulation and the test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, it is also mandatory to consider a catenary model as realistic and efficient as possible to be solved in real-time. To fulfill these requirements, we use the analytic catenary model proposed in [ 8 ] and a periodic catenary finite element model [ 27 ]. The code of the catenary model runs on an (Intel ® Core™ i9-9900K CPU, 3.6 GHz, 64 GB RAM) PC that allows high-speed processing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Daniel A. et.al [31] used the intermediate-complex method is more efficient than a fully resolved finite element simulation but more general than beam theory or homogenization. J. Gil et al [32] present a general method for computing the dynamic response of periodic infinite structures under a moving load. In this study, the CAD model is imported into ANSYS workbench for FEA characteristics and to validate the aforementioned analysis technique which is illustrated in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%