2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2003.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element simulation and experimental validation of fretting wear

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

16
284
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 426 publications
(332 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
16
284
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…An approach involving an incremental wear simulation was developed by McColl et al for a cylinder on flat arrangement. The approach used a modified Archard wear equation (including experimental validation), which was applied differentially in terms of contact pressure and slip, on a nodal basis to incorporate material removal effects [7].…”
Section: Tangential Force Q(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An approach involving an incremental wear simulation was developed by McColl et al for a cylinder on flat arrangement. The approach used a modified Archard wear equation (including experimental validation), which was applied differentially in terms of contact pressure and slip, on a nodal basis to incorporate material removal effects [7].…”
Section: Tangential Force Q(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to our inability to measure this local wear coefficient, one approach is to assume that a bulk wear coefficient, k, which is measured across the complete contact width, can be employed. This bulk wear coefficient can be determined from the measured wear scar [7] using the following equation:…”
Section: Wear Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first FEM of fretting wear presented in 2004 [19]. The advantage of FEM is that it can describe the local contact information and fretting damage during the fretting wear process, which is difficult to achieve by experiment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of FEM is that it can describe the local contact information and fretting damage during the fretting wear process, which is difficult to achieve by experiment. However, most of the models that are used to predict fretting wear do not consider the effect of roughness [18][19][20] due to the small size of asperities and its statistical distribution leading to high computational demanding. Though the semi-analytical model proposed by Kasarekar et al [21] and the discrete element approach study done by Leonard et al [22] simulated the effects of roughness on fretting wear, both of them only neglected the random nature of the rough surfaces, analysing only one roughness profile per case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%