2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element simulation of springback for a channel draw process with drawbead using different hardening models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selfadaptive remeshing was applied in the blank due to large plastic strain during deformation. To precisely simulate the flow behavior of the material in the forming process, the total number of elements arranged in a blank is around 20000, with four layers through the sheet thickness, as suggested by Taherizadeh et al [14].…”
Section: Finite Element Analysis (Fea)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selfadaptive remeshing was applied in the blank due to large plastic strain during deformation. To precisely simulate the flow behavior of the material in the forming process, the total number of elements arranged in a blank is around 20000, with four layers through the sheet thickness, as suggested by Taherizadeh et al [14].…”
Section: Finite Element Analysis (Fea)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To precisely simulate the flow behavior of material in the forming process, the total number of elements arranged in a blank is around 20,000, with four layers through the sheet thickness, as suggested in Taherizadeh et al (2009). The material parameters of AISI 1035 steel were obtained via compression tests using a material testing machine (GLEEBLE 3500,DSI).…”
Section: Orthogonal Test Based On Fe Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, an appropriate constitutive model that properly describes material behavior at large strain is needed. Sophisticated phenomelogical models have been developed considering anisotropic yielding [13][14][15][16][17] and kinematic hardening rules [16][17][18][19] to simulate forming processes. In particular, an accurate description of stress-strain responses during a stress reversal is of vital importance for an accurate prediction of springback.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%