1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0363(199706)24:12<1271::aid-fld559>3.0.co;2-#
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element simulation of vacuum arc remelting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following assumptions are made throughout this work: 1) The computational domain only includes the ingot. Current and heat enter the computational domain from the ingot top [ 17 ] ; 2) The molten steel is incompressible fluid, and the top surface of molten pool is flat and stationary; [ 18 ] 3) The melt rate is assumed to be constant, and the height of ingot is uniformly increased; 4) The inclusions are assumed to be stable and spherical, and there is no mass transfer between inclusions and molten steel. [ 19 ] Ignore the aggregation behavior of inclusions; and 5) Only inclusions brought into the molten pool by the droplets are considered in the model, and inclusions uniformly enter the molten steel from molten pool surface under the end of electrode.…”
Section: Numerical Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following assumptions are made throughout this work: 1) The computational domain only includes the ingot. Current and heat enter the computational domain from the ingot top [ 17 ] ; 2) The molten steel is incompressible fluid, and the top surface of molten pool is flat and stationary; [ 18 ] 3) The melt rate is assumed to be constant, and the height of ingot is uniformly increased; 4) The inclusions are assumed to be stable and spherical, and there is no mass transfer between inclusions and molten steel. [ 19 ] Ignore the aggregation behavior of inclusions; and 5) Only inclusions brought into the molten pool by the droplets are considered in the model, and inclusions uniformly enter the molten steel from molten pool surface under the end of electrode.…”
Section: Numerical Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of the authors' knowledge, passive estimation of the current distribution during VAR (or other processes) from magnetic field measurements is a novel technique and has not yet been reported elsewhere. A number of studies have been published on VAR which focus on the effect that the current distribution has on the liquid metal flow in the melt pool and in the mushy zone using finite element methods [13] or finite difference/finite volume methods [14,15], showing its significance, but they do not discuss its measurement. It would be undesirable to use active sensing methods as the application of direct or alternating magnetic field and/or current can alter the flow patterns in the melt pool, leading to defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%