2010
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0000108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-Element Simulations of Full-Scale Modular-Block Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls under Earthquake Loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they also showed the magnitude of amplification was influence by magnitude of damping ratio used in numerical modeling. The selection of Rayleigh damping coefficients for the soil was investigated by Ling et al [30] who determined that for models with a peak acceleration of 0.4 g, a 15 % and for models with maximum acceleration of 0.8 g, a 5 % damping value produced the most satisfactory results.…”
Section: Review Of Past Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they also showed the magnitude of amplification was influence by magnitude of damping ratio used in numerical modeling. The selection of Rayleigh damping coefficients for the soil was investigated by Ling et al [30] who determined that for models with a peak acceleration of 0.4 g, a 15 % and for models with maximum acceleration of 0.8 g, a 5 % damping value produced the most satisfactory results.…”
Section: Review Of Past Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of Rayleigh damping coefficients for the soil was later investigated by [27], concluding that for models with a peak acceleration of 0.4 g, a 15% damping value produced the most satisfactory results. For models with maximum acceleration of 0.8 g, the damping was lowered to 5%.…”
Section: Validation Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seismic behaviour of GRS retaining walls has been numerically investigated using mainly FLAC or FLAC3D codes [21,22,26,29,30], DIANA-Swandyne-II [24,25,27], DYNA3D or LS-DYNA [23,28] and ABACUS [14]. Different elements were assumed to model the reinforcement layers (cable elements, shell elements, bar elements, truss elements and beam elements), assuming in general elastic or elastic-plastic behaviour.…”
Section: Numerical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations