2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-016-1011-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element stress analysis of functionally graded dental implant of a premolar tooth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This coefficient is the mean adjustment and represents the expected change in response per unit change in the value of the factor if the other factors remain constant. ANOVA analysis is a regression analysis used to investigate the effects of response output factors that find factors that are noted to affect the process, based on the priority confidence intervals in the model [39].…”
Section: Statistical Modelling Of 3d-printed Dental Implantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This coefficient is the mean adjustment and represents the expected change in response per unit change in the value of the factor if the other factors remain constant. ANOVA analysis is a regression analysis used to investigate the effects of response output factors that find factors that are noted to affect the process, based on the priority confidence intervals in the model [39].…”
Section: Statistical Modelling Of 3d-printed Dental Implantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dentistry, ceramic FGMs were mainly studied for the use as implant abutments. 13,14 For the success of a dental implant's osteointegration, several factors should be considered which include health and bone quality, surgical techniques, implant design, surface characteristic, and the biomaterial and biomechanical factors. 15 Their use as dental implant abutment is due to the higher toughness and the lower modulus of elasticity, increased esthetics, and corrosion resistance.…”
Section: Inception Of Fgm In Dentistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, FGBM implants were usually graded in radial direction [15][16][17][18][19][20]. They showed that employing axial FGBM implants resulted in stress reduction in the implanted bone [14][15][16][17] and biocompatibility improvement in the dental implant system [18][19][20]. As an alternative approach, the gradient can be distributed radially so that the properties of radial FGBM implant varied gradually from a stiffer biomaterial in the center of the implant to a more biocompatible and bioactive material as the outer layer in contact with the hosting bone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%