1976
DOI: 10.1177/00220345760550060201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Stress Analysis of the Crowns of Normal and Restored Teeth

Abstract: Stress distributions are presented for a normal and a restored mandibular second premolar under masticatory-type forces. These were obtained using the finite element method of stress analysis applied to two-dimensional models. The effect of the relative stiffness of the materials is examined in each instance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
78
0
11

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
78
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The compressive fracture strength (CFS) is the only strength test specified for inclusion in ISO 9917-1: 2003 -the international standard for powder/liquid acid-base cements and restoratives [1]. The selection of CFS for assessing powder/liquid acid-base cements and restoratives has previously been justified as a relevant indicator of applied service performance [2,3]. Investigators have suggested that loading during masticatory function results in stressing patterns analogous to those observed during CFS testing [2] and proposed that a high CFS was necessary to tolerate the functional forces routinely encountered in the posterior region of the mouth [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compressive fracture strength (CFS) is the only strength test specified for inclusion in ISO 9917-1: 2003 -the international standard for powder/liquid acid-base cements and restoratives [1]. The selection of CFS for assessing powder/liquid acid-base cements and restoratives has previously been justified as a relevant indicator of applied service performance [2,3]. Investigators have suggested that loading during masticatory function results in stressing patterns analogous to those observed during CFS testing [2] and proposed that a high CFS was necessary to tolerate the functional forces routinely encountered in the posterior region of the mouth [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress analysis was focused at the CEJ area of buccal and palatal surface based on the reports of many FEA studies 12,[23][24][25] . Kuroe et al 26) also confirmed by the photoelastic method that a vertical force loaded on the tooth causes stress concentration at the cervical line.…”
Section: ⅳ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Borcic et al 20) and Ichim et al 18) also went on an experiment with 200 N of loading. Therefore, stress range of intraoral loading seems to be within the value of 170 -200 N. In this study, a tooth model loaded by a point load of static 200 N was considered more representative of normal chewing load situation, in contrast to other FE analysis studies 23,[33][34][35] . Previous studies [18][19][20] were based on applying load on buccal cusp.…”
Section: ⅳ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%