1972
DOI: 10.1061/jsdeag.0003282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Thermoelastoplastic Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The integration process corresponds to the Euler forward scheme or the explicit scheme. However, the problem with assessing the integrands at the beginning of the time step (point A on figure 1) or at the onset of yielding (point B) is that, as pointed out by Cyr & Teter (1972) and Allen & Haisler (1981), the solution does not converge to the desired point C. Instead it converges to point C as shown by the dashed line. It was also suggested by de Borst (1984) that the stress increment be divided into small subincrements and each subincrement evaluated according to equations (8) with the integrands evaluated at the beginning of the subincrement.…”
Section: De{dg/d<r}{df/d<r}tdementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The integration process corresponds to the Euler forward scheme or the explicit scheme. However, the problem with assessing the integrands at the beginning of the time step (point A on figure 1) or at the onset of yielding (point B) is that, as pointed out by Cyr & Teter (1972) and Allen & Haisler (1981), the solution does not converge to the desired point C. Instead it converges to point C as shown by the dashed line. It was also suggested by de Borst (1984) that the stress increment be divided into small subincrements and each subincrement evaluated according to equations (8) with the integrands evaluated at the beginning of the subincrement.…”
Section: De{dg/d<r}{df/d<r}tdementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, there exist some publications relating to thermoelastoplastic problems (Cyr & Teter 1972;Chang 1973;Sharifi & Yates 1974;Kulak et al 1978;Haisler & Sanders 1979 ;Syder & Bathe 1981;Allen & Haisler 1981;de Borst 1984;van Foeken 1984van Foeken , 1985Kleiber 1991). However, most of them were formulated for metal-like materials obeying the Von Mises yield criterion, except van Foeken (1984van Foeken ( , 1985 who made use of the Drucker-Prager yield criterion for the analysis of concrete structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%