1992
DOI: 10.2307/2159735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Exponential Series and Newman Polynomials

Abstract: Abstract.A Newman polynomial is a sum of powers of z, with constant term 1. The Newman polynomial of four terms whose minimum modulus on the unit circle is as large as possible is found by examining the expression /(4) = sup inf and determining an extremal system (xx, ... , x4) using a technique that reduces the problem to a finite search.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conjectured values of λ(4), λ(5), and λ(6) were obtained by the current author by considering a n ≤ 20. It was conjectured in [5] that µ(n) is monotone, but note that if our conjectured values for λ(5) and λ(6 2 Results…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The conjectured values of λ(4), λ(5), and λ(6) were obtained by the current author by considering a n ≤ 20. It was conjectured in [5] that µ(n) is monotone, but note that if our conjectured values for λ(5) and λ(6 2 Results…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…We note that one can make plausible guesses about other values of λ(n) and µ(n) by searching cosine polynomials or Newman polynomials of bounded degree. The conjectured values of µ(5) and µ(6) given below appear in [5] and were obtained by considering a n ≤ 30. (There is a small error in [5]; the author mistakenly writes the square of the conjectured value of µ (6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Campbell et al [2] proved that µ(3) = M(0, 1, 3), and Goddard [6] proved that µ(4) = M(0, 1, 2, 4). In this article, we prove that λ(2) = −L(1, 2) and λ(3) = −L(1, 2, 3), and that 1 ≤ µ(5) ≤ 1 + π/5.…”
Section: It Seems That the Growth Of µ(N) Is Less Studied Than The Gr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown in [6] that f (3) is attained at the polynomial 1 + x 2 + x 3 . It seems that this is a mere coincidence, because the polynomial 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 maximizing f (4) (see [13]) is of no use in the study of "small" Q m (P ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%