2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.115414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-frequency noise of interacting single-electron emitters: Spectroscopy with higher noise harmonics

Abstract: We derive the symmetrized current-noise spectrum of a quantum dot, which is weakly tunnelcoupled to an electron reservoir and driven by a slow time-dependent gate voltage. This setup can be operated as an on-demand emitter of single electrons into a mesoscopic conductor. By extending a real-time diagrammatic technique which is perturbative in the tunnel coupling, we obtain the timeresolved finite-frequency noise as well as its decomposition into noise harmonics in the presence of both strong Coulomb interactio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could establish connections between deviations from finite-frequency FRR due to strong interactions, discovered in Ref. [36] and first connections between finite frequency noise and energy currents established for noninteracting systems in Ref. [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could establish connections between deviations from finite-frequency FRR due to strong interactions, discovered in Ref. [36] and first connections between finite frequency noise and energy currents established for noninteracting systems in Ref. [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Secondly, the additional step to derive the explicit FRR for specific cumulants has been omitted. For this reason, the mechanism underlying recently discovered deviations of the FRR in the presence of time-dependent driving compared to known stationary FRR in systems with strong many-body correlations [35,36], remained unclear so far. Furthermore, we believe that this lack of specificity resulted in an incomplete understanding of the importance of many-body interactions in driven systems, first hinted at in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the measurement of a time-resolved noise is challenging, below I focus on a frequency-resolved noise [45][46][47][48][49][50][51] , which was measured more than once, see, e.g., Refs. 52-54 and also Ref.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, in contrast to previous works [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]—for a review, see in [ 33 ]—I will focus on comparing auto- and cross-correlation noise. I will show that, in the case of a periodic train of non-overlapping single-electron wave packets scattered off the wave splitter with reflection probability R , there are two contributions to noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%