Groups, Combinatorics and Geometry 2003
DOI: 10.1142/9789812564481_0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite groups of local characteristic p An Overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let E be an elementary abelian 2-group of order 2 18 . Then Aut(E) ∼ = GL 18 (2) contains a subgroup X similar to a 3-normalizer in U 6 (2).…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Let E be an elementary abelian 2-group of order 2 18 . Then Aut(E) ∼ = GL 18 (2) contains a subgroup X similar to a 3-normalizer in U 6 (2).…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then Aut(E) ∼ = GL 18 (2) contains a subgroup X similar to a 3-normalizer in U 6 (2). Hence the semidirect product EX satisfies the hypothesis of Theorem 1 and, in this case, Z is weakly closed in S. In fact, if we were prepared to invoke the classification of finite simple groups, then we could apply [7,Remark 7.8.3] to see that if Z were weakly closed in S,…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is expected that the programme to identify the K-proper groups of local characteristic p orchestrated by Meierfrankenfeld, Stellmacher and Stroth (see [20]) will soon have a list of possible amalgams within such groups. Some of these amalgams will uniquely determine the target group via its p-local geometry (for example via the building if G is expected to be a Lie type group in characteristic p of rank at least 3).…”
Section: §1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears frequently as a subquotient in minimal parabolic subgroups of groups of Lie type in characteristic p and, on a wider canvas, often arises in classification problems. One reason why SL 2 (p a ) is encountered in such problems is that its natural 2-dimensional GF(p a )-module is a failure of factorization module-see for example [1], [3], [4]. Other modules for SL 2 (p a ) are also important by virtue of their appearance as chief factors in the unipotent radical of rank 1 parabolic subgroups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%