1994
DOI: 10.2307/2159890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Index Subfactors and Hopf Algebra Crossed Products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to [16] there is a 12 dimensional Hopf- * -algebra A such that R G ⊂ F is equivalent to R A ⊂ R where A acts on R by an outer action. A is neither commutative nor cocommutative as in the principal and in the dual principal graph there are even vertices which are connected with the unique odd vertex by more than one edge.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [16] there is a 12 dimensional Hopf- * -algebra A such that R G ⊂ F is equivalent to R A ⊂ R where A acts on R by an outer action. A is neither commutative nor cocommutative as in the principal and in the dual principal graph there are even vertices which are connected with the unique odd vertex by more than one edge.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If A and B are factors then B is isomorphic to a crossed product of A by an (outer) action of a finite dimensional Kac (C * -Hopf) algebra ( [8], [13]). Izumi showed in [2] that if A and B are unital simple C * -algebras then there is an action of a finite dimensional C * -Hopf algebra H on B such that A is the fixed point C * -subalgebra B H .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well understood now that Hopf algebras and weak Hopf algebras arise as non-commutative symmetries of Jones towers of certain finite index inclusions of topological algebras over the complex numbers. For a finite index von Neumann subfactor N ⊆ M it was shown by Szymański [26] that the depth 2 condition for the associated tower of centralizers C M N ⊆ C M 1 N ⊆ C M 2 M ⊆ · · · is equivalent to A = C M 1 N having a natural structure of a Hopf C * -algebra, if C M N = 1 In the general case where C M N ⊇ 1, it was shown by Vainerman and the second author [18] that the depth 2 condition is equivalent to A being a weak Hopf C * -algebra. In both cases, A acts on M in such a way that N = M A and M 1 ∼ = M#A; moreover, B = C M 2 M is naturally identified with the (weak) Hopf C * -algebra dual to A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%