Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.98CH36171)
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.1998.760741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite memory generalised state observer for failure detection in dynamic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can find only few publications in which such an approach is presented (e.g., Medvedev, 1996;Nuninger et al, 1998). Commonly for diagnostic purposes, the asymptotic Luenberger estimator is applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can find only few publications in which such an approach is presented (e.g., Medvedev, 1996;Nuninger et al, 1998). Commonly for diagnostic purposes, the asymptotic Luenberger estimator is applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the results of the suggested method are better than those of GPB1 method. This fact can 45th IEEE CDC, San Diego, USA, Dec. [13][14][15]2006 ThA09.4 be explained by the sensitivity of GPB1 to the noise affecting the system state and measurement (the signal to noise ratio in the example is equal to 10%). This allows us to conclude that the use of SWO, for fault detection in switching systems, is less sensitive to noise than traditional GPB methods.…”
Section: An Application Examplementioning
confidence: 96%
“…To overcome this drawback, another class of observers using finite number of delayed input/output measurements on a finite time window was also defined. These observers are denoted using various terms such as finite-memory, receding-horizon or sliding-window estimation [15], [16] and [11]. Finite memory estimation is often accomplished according to the minimization of a least-squares criterion (see among others, [13] and [14]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toivonen in [12,13] continued the study of such mixed types of state observers and called them "finite memory deadbeat observers." Some other version of the finite memory deadbeat observer was also presented in [14]. However, all of the above observer's versions were based on standard least squares approach and are only subcases of the general form of the exact and optimal state observer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%