1995
DOI: 10.1080/00927879508825488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite metacyclic1‐eand1‐agroups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, one may observe that the metacyclic group (3, 2, 1, 1, −) does not appear at all in B. W. King's classification, the reason being exactly the above mentioned condition, which must be therefore ignored. The same remark was made by G. L. Peterson [5].…”
Section: Classification Of the Finite Non-abelian 2-generated 2-groupssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Moreover, one may observe that the metacyclic group (3, 2, 1, 1, −) does not appear at all in B. W. King's classification, the reason being exactly the above mentioned condition, which must be therefore ignored. The same remark was made by G. L. Peterson [5].…”
Section: Classification Of the Finite Non-abelian 2-generated 2-groupssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…There are many papers regarding polynomial automorphisms. For example, we can cite [1,11,13,14,17,20]. Also it is worth mentioning an interesting result of [8] stating that in a non-abelian finite simple group G, every function f G → G is polynomial; it follows that Aut G = PAut G in such a group.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%