1973
DOI: 10.1063/1.1662393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite pulse-time and heat-loss effects in pulse thermal diffusivity measurements

Abstract: The heat transfer problem associated with pulse thermal diffusivity measurements is analyzed for the cases of (i) triangular pulses whose widths are comparable with the transit time of temperature fronts across a sample (finite pulse width effects), (ii) heat losses from sample faces, and (iii) the simultaneous occurrence of heat losses and finite pulse-width effects. Methods for the analysis of experimental results which are affected by these conditions are discussed. Tabular and graphical data which facilita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
5

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
41
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The software supplied with the apparatus uses 5 different analysis methods to compute the thermal diffusivity. These methods are the Parker 20 , Heckman 21 , Cowan 22 , Clark and Taylor 23 , and Degiovanni 24 methods. Each analysis method, except for the Parker method, uses a different approach to correct for deviations from the ideal caused by factors such as radiative cooling, 2-D heat flow, and others.…”
Section: Microstructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The software supplied with the apparatus uses 5 different analysis methods to compute the thermal diffusivity. These methods are the Parker 20 , Heckman 21 , Cowan 22 , Clark and Taylor 23 , and Degiovanni 24 methods. Each analysis method, except for the Parker method, uses a different approach to correct for deviations from the ideal caused by factors such as radiative cooling, 2-D heat flow, and others.…”
Section: Microstructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two different models were then applied to fit the experimental data. The first model is the two-layers adiabatic model [25], whereas the second model takes into account the heat loss of the sample [31], and the contact resistance at the interface between the coatings and the substrate [32]. In addition, due to the measurement processing, estimated thickness values of the coatings were used to perform the experiments, and the values obtained were corrected to account for the true thicknesses of the coatings.…”
Section: Thermal Diffusivity Of the Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: T m ϭ1 000 K, Dϭ0.001 m, kϭ1 W/m K), the order of L m is less than one (L m Ϲ1) in Eq. (9). As the heat loss in DHTT will be large at the detection thermocouple (CH-2) and the difference of heat loss between the radiation and the conduction is quite large, the characteristic two cases of heat loss are assumed as L 1 ϭ L 2 ϭ1 and L 1 ϭL 2 ϭ1 000 (triangular pulse; tϭ0.2 (pulse duration), t c ϭ20.736 and bϭ0.1: Appendix I).…”
Section: Effect Of Heat Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%