2017
DOI: 10.5755/j01.eie.23.5.19240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-Set Model Predictive Direct Power Control of Grid Connected Current Source Inverter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four different configuration of the Boost converter including the Conventional (CB), Cascaded Conventional (Cas-B) [2], the Proposed Boost with the Pre-Amplifier (PA-PB) and (PA-PB) with the Switched -Capacitor (PA-PB and SC) blocks selected and tested by the MATLAB/SIMULINK for voltage gain and efficiency assessments.…”
Section: A Performance Analysis For the Projected Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four different configuration of the Boost converter including the Conventional (CB), Cascaded Conventional (Cas-B) [2], the Proposed Boost with the Pre-Amplifier (PA-PB) and (PA-PB) with the Switched -Capacitor (PA-PB and SC) blocks selected and tested by the MATLAB/SIMULINK for voltage gain and efficiency assessments.…”
Section: A Performance Analysis For the Projected Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are over two million residential PV power plants only in Germany, and most of these plants have installed in power ranges less than 5 kWp [1]. A boost converter circuit is required in a PV-based power generation system because of variable weather conditions [2], [3], and it is generally used to provide a continuous DC voltage to the input of a grid-connected inverter, and also to the DC loads [4], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The works of Correa et al (2009) and Zavala et al (2013) use reactive power and direct current (DC) in the equation to control the current and provide unity power factor. Prediction of the grid and DC current has been shown by Michalik et al (2016) and Feroura et al (2017). All these methods differ from each other depending on the predicted physical quantity and the construction of the cost function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%