2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1607.08522
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-size corrections to Fermi's Golden rule II: Quasi-stationary composite states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the lowest-order perturbation is not good and the higher-order effect must be included. In the next section, we show that the finite-size correction P rad ) in the higher-order approximation [20][21][22][23]. The result obtained in this section means that the emitted scalar particle has a higher energy than the donor excitation energy E D due to the interaction energy.…”
Section: B Finite-size Correction Of the Spontaneous Scalar-particle ...mentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the lowest-order perturbation is not good and the higher-order effect must be included. In the next section, we show that the finite-size correction P rad ) in the higher-order approximation [20][21][22][23]. The result obtained in this section means that the emitted scalar particle has a higher energy than the donor excitation energy E D due to the interaction energy.…”
Section: B Finite-size Correction Of the Spontaneous Scalar-particle ...mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In order to include the finite-size effect and the lifetime effect, we use the following ansatz [22,23], which is derived by considering the higher-order perturbation theory:…”
Section: Higher-order Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we do not consider corrections due to processes taking place over a finite-time interval (instead of an infinite time interval). This has been well studied in other work [4][5][6][7]. More recently, in [8] a systematic study was undertaken to derive Fermi's golden rule in QFT within a Gaussian wave packet formalism [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…They showed that the bulk contribution leads to Fermi's golden rule while the boundary part can contribute deviations from it. This provided a solid framework in which to view the results of the aforementioned work [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Ishikawa et al claim that indeed a wave-packet effect-more specifically the time-boundary effect due to localization of wave-packet overlap in timeis responsible for diverse phenomena in science such as the LSND neutrino anomaly [2,3]; violation of selection rules [4]; the solar coronal heating problem [5]; anomalous Thomson scattering and a speculative alternative to dark matter, as well as modified Haag theorem [6]; the anomalous excitation energy transfer in photosynthesis [7]; and anomalies in width in e + e − → γγ, in π 0 lifetime, in Raman scattering, and in the water vapor continuum absorption [8,9]. There is an ongoing experimental project for this effect [8,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%