2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.83.011704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-size scaling analysis of isotropic-nematic phase transitions in an anisometric Lennard-Jones fluid

Abstract: By means of Monte Carlo simulations in the isothermal-isobaric ensemble, we perform a finite-size scaling analysis of the isotropic-nematic (IN) phase transition. Our model consists of egg-shaped anisometric Lennard-Jones molecules. We employ the cumulant intersection method to locate the pressure P* at which the IN phase transition occurs at a given temperature T. In particular, we focus on second-order cumulants of the largest and middle eigenvalues of the alignment tensor. At fixed T, cumulants for various … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(134 reference statements)
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these small values of λ ( z ) should be perceived as a consequence of the finiteness of our system, an effect which is well understood and has been analyzed quantitatively for the achiral version of our model [37]. As before, in the cholesteric phase, n x ( z ) and n y ( z ) can be described by sine or cosine functions, indicating that there is a remaining director rotating in the x – y plane, but, now, with an almost vanishingly small order parameter, which also explains the relative noisiness of n x ( z ) in Figure 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these small values of λ ( z ) should be perceived as a consequence of the finiteness of our system, an effect which is well understood and has been analyzed quantitatively for the achiral version of our model [37]. As before, in the cholesteric phase, n x ( z ) and n y ( z ) can be described by sine or cosine functions, indicating that there is a remaining director rotating in the x – y plane, but, now, with an almost vanishingly small order parameter, which also explains the relative noisiness of n x ( z ) in Figure 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It turns out that at SMF level, T * is underestimated whereas at MMF level it is overestimated.To overcome this problem we determine T * via FSS. Following Ref 17. we first calculate the coexistence temperature T IN ≃ 1.02 at the IN phase transition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…we first calculate the coexistence temperature T IN ≃ 1.02 at the IN phase transition. It is given as the intersection of the second-order Binder cumulants of S for different system sizes[17]. From the expression T * = T IN − 2B 2 /9aC[18] and using B, C, and a from DFT, T * can easily be determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…denotes a unit vector. As in our previous work [19][20][21][22] we decompose the intermolecular interaction potential into an isotropic and an anisotropic contribution,…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%