2010
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.82.051134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-size scaling in Ising-like systems with quenched random fields: Evidence of hyperscaling violation

Abstract: In systems belonging to the universality class of the random field Ising model, the standard hyperscaling relation between critical exponents does not hold, but is replaced with a modified hyperscaling relation. As a result, standard formulations of finite-size scaling near critical points break down. In this work, the consequences of modified hyperscaling are analyzed in detail. The most striking outcome is that the free-energy cost ΔF of interface formation at the critical point is no longer a universal cons… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
64
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
64
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, despite the huge efforts recorded in the literature, a clear picture of the model's critical behavior is still lacking. Although the view that the phase transition of the RFIM is of second order is well established [48][49][50]64], the extremely small value of the exponent β continues to cast some doubts. Moreover, a rather strong debate exists with regards to the role of disorder: the available simulations are not able to settle the question of whether the critical exponents depend on the particular choice of the distribution for the random fields, analogous to the mean-field theory predictions [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, despite the huge efforts recorded in the literature, a clear picture of the model's critical behavior is still lacking. Although the view that the phase transition of the RFIM is of second order is well established [48][49][50]64], the extremely small value of the exponent β continues to cast some doubts. Moreover, a rather strong debate exists with regards to the role of disorder: the available simulations are not able to settle the question of whether the critical exponents depend on the particular choice of the distribution for the random fields, analogous to the mean-field theory predictions [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, typical Monte Carlo schemes get trapped into local minima with escape time exponential in ξ θ , where ξ denotes the correlation length. Although sophisticated improvements have appeared [48][49][50][51][52], these simulations produced low-accuracy data because they were limited to linear sizes of the order of L max 32. Larger sizes can be achieved at T = 0, through the wellknown mapping of the ground state to the maximum-flow optimization problem [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the hyperscaling violations exponent θ , which can be related to the free-energy barrier between the ordered and the disordered phase: F ∝ L θ . 14 The computation of these barriers is very difficult with traditional methods, but straightforward with TMC. Indeed, we can identify F with the ¯ N between the two saddle points (disordered and antiferromagnetic) defined by the critical h c .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the view that the phase transition of the RFIM is nowadays considered to be of second order [19][20][21][22][23][24], the extremely small value of the exponent β casts some doubt on the interpretation of numerical and experimental results. Moreover, a rather strong debate with regards to the role of disorder, i.e., the dependence, or not, of the critical exponents on the particular choice of the distribution for the random fields and the value of the disorder strength, analogously to the mean-field theory predictions [15], was only recently put on a different basis [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%