2012
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2012.2190676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-Time Consensus for Leader-Following Second-Order Multi-Agent Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time costs in the reaching phase and sliding phase are both finite. In addition, compared with finite-time consensus control in [28,[31][32][33], the second-order MAS are extended from linear systems to non-linear systems. Compared with [7,29,30,36], the finite-time consensus control approach in this paper proposes a milder condition to the inherent nonlinear dynamics of the systems, that is, the condition that non-linear dynamics must be bounded by a known constant is not required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The time costs in the reaching phase and sliding phase are both finite. In addition, compared with finite-time consensus control in [28,[31][32][33], the second-order MAS are extended from linear systems to non-linear systems. Compared with [7,29,30,36], the finite-time consensus control approach in this paper proposes a milder condition to the inherent nonlinear dynamics of the systems, that is, the condition that non-linear dynamics must be bounded by a known constant is not required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So it is significant to investigate the finite-time leader-following consensus control of MAS. In recent years, a few of efforts have been taken to solve the finite time consensus control problem [11,12,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. However, most of them dealt with the consensus problem of linear MAS with directed or undirected communication topology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reaching agreement in a finite time allows the network to use precise information in the completion of other tasks. There have been some results related to finite-time synchronization (FTS) [20], [21]. Du et al [20] considered the FTS of a class of the second-order nonlinear multiagent systems using output feedback control, which showed that the systems output can reach synchronization in a finite time and the final consensus states are leader's states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Du et al [20] considered the FTS of a class of the second-order nonlinear multiagent systems using output feedback control, which showed that the systems output can reach synchronization in a finite time and the final consensus states are leader's states. Based on the graph theory, matrix theory, homogeneity with dilation and the LaSalles invariance principle, Guan et al [21] studied the leader-following finite-time consensus problem for the secondorder multiagent networks with fixed and switched topologies. Now, based on the well-known finite-time stability theory, the issue of FTS (including finite-time consensus) has been extensively studied under continuous or discontinuous control protocols [22]- [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the existing consensus protocols for multi-agent systems mentioned previously only provided asymptotic convergence, which means that convergence rates of the considered systems are asymptotic with an infinite settling time and the goal of consensus cannot be achieved in a finite time. Actually, in practical applications, finite-time consensus (FTC) protocols are more desirable that holds not only the faster convergence rates but also better disturbance rejection properties and better robustness against uncertainties [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. So far, existing research in FTC mainly concerns with continuous consensus protocols and discontinuous ones [25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%