2014
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2013.0759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite‐time H control with average dwell‐time constraint for time‐delay Markov jump systems governed by deterministic switches

Abstract: This study considers the problem of finite-time H ∞ control for a class of discrete-time time-delay Markov jump linear systems governed by deterministic switches. By allowing the stochastic Lyapunov function to increase at every switching instant with a limited increase rate, new results on the stochastic finite-time boundness with given H ∞ disturbance attenuation level are derived. Moreover, the coupling relationship among time-delay, average dwell time and given finite-time horizon of the underlying system … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An input‐output model by substituting a feedback interconnection formulation for the time‐delayed filtering error MJSs is proposed in the work of Wei et al Zhang et al use a mode‐dependent Lyapunov‐Krasovskii functional that includes tripe integrals term to provide the stability conditions. This result is further extended in the work of Luan et al, which studies the finite‐time H control subject to the average dwell‐time constraint for discrete case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…An input‐output model by substituting a feedback interconnection formulation for the time‐delayed filtering error MJSs is proposed in the work of Wei et al Zhang et al use a mode‐dependent Lyapunov‐Krasovskii functional that includes tripe integrals term to provide the stability conditions. This result is further extended in the work of Luan et al, which studies the finite‐time H control subject to the average dwell‐time constraint for discrete case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…A special case of the TVJRs is the time‐invariant JRs, which can be described as normalΠ=[]π11π12π1sπ21π22π2sπs1πs2πss. Remark Note that in the system , the high‐level deterministic switching only affects the TVJRs, which is quite different from the SD‐MJLS , where the model is described by a combination of a finite number of linear subsystems indexed by both the deterministic switching signal and stochastic jumping process. Therefore, the system is able to depict a large number of time‐varying MJDSs with less complexity where only a single MJDS is considered.Remark The TVJR matrix is modeled by JRs subject to ADT constraint.…”
Section: System Description and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that in the system (1), the high-level deterministic switching only affects the TVJRs, which is quite different from the SD-MJLS [9][10][11][29][30][31], where the model is described by a combination of a finite number of linear subsystems indexed by both the deterministic switching signal and stochastic jumping process. Therefore, the system (1) is able to depict a large number of timevarying MJDSs with less complexity where only a single MJDS is considered.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations