2014
DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2014.974675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-time stabilisation of simple mechanical systems using continuous feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equations (20) and (21) κ . It can be proven by analysis similar to Steps 1) and 2) that the reduced system obtained from (20) and (21) is uniformly bounded according to Assumption 2.1. Lemma 2.1 can then be used to confirm uniform local finite-time stability of the equilibria in 1 E .…”
Section: Gftac With Full-state Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equations (20) and (21) κ . It can be proven by analysis similar to Steps 1) and 2) that the reduced system obtained from (20) and (21) is uniformly bounded according to Assumption 2.1. Lemma 2.1 can then be used to confirm uniform local finite-time stability of the equilibria in 1 E .…”
Section: Gftac With Full-state Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite-time stable systems usually demonstrate fast convergence rates and significant disturbance rejection properties [11][12][13][14]. Given these properties, finite-time attitude regulators were constructed in [15] via a fractional-power feedback domination approach, in [16] by the terminal sliding mode (TSM) method, in [17,18] by homogeneous theory, and in [19] by a TSM-like method proposed in [20] for simple mechanical systems. None of these control laws, however, ensures global stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach in is extended and applied to the dynamics of a rigid body rotating under the action of a control torque and an unknown external moment. This extension, in going from a mechanical system represented by generalized coordinates in double-struckRn to attitude dynamics on the configuration space SO(3), is non‐trivial, because SO(3) is non‐contractible unlike double-struckRn.…”
Section: Almost Global Finite‐time Stabilization Of Rigid Body Attitumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the signum function is not needed in the definition of the control torque, unlike the schemes in , for example, because the powers of only positive‐definite quantities occur in the control law, the Lyapunov function, and its time derivative along the feedback system. This is a practically useful property that follows from the framework given in for continuous finite‐time stabilization of mechanical systems with multiple degrees of freedom. The following result gives an equivalent asymptotically stable feedback stabilization scheme that is obtained from the finite‐time stabilization scheme of Theorem in the limiting case of p = 1.Proposition Let α=1p and consider the control law when evaluated in the limit that α = 1.…”
Section: Finite‐time Attitude Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation