2023
DOI: 10.1049/cth2.12505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite‐time tracking control of disturbed non‐holonomic systems with input saturation and state constraints: Theory and experiment

Abstract: This article investigates the finite‐time tracking control problem for disturbed non‐holonomic systems with input saturation and state constraints. Input saturation is ensured by utilizing saturated state feedback and designing auxiliary variables. A rigorous design procedure, which combines barrier Lyapunov function‐based backstepping and neural networks, is introduced to satisfy state constraints and overcome the influence of lumped disturbances. A finite‐time filter is developed to address the explosion of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The designed parameters are shown in the second line of Table 3. It is worth pointing out that the relative distance and bearing angle constraints consisting of ( 8)- (10) would never be violated when Equations ( 12) and ( 13) hold. Thus, the parameters of PPF are selected in the third line of Table 3 for better convergence property of the tracking error system (11).…”
Section: Example 1: Circle Trajectorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The designed parameters are shown in the second line of Table 3. It is worth pointing out that the relative distance and bearing angle constraints consisting of ( 8)- (10) would never be violated when Equations ( 12) and ( 13) hold. Thus, the parameters of PPF are selected in the third line of Table 3 for better convergence property of the tracking error system (11).…”
Section: Example 1: Circle Trajectorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practically, the nonholonomic constraint brings difficulties to the controller design for the stabilization of NMRs, since the system does not satisfy Brockett's theorem [9]. Therefore, it cannot be stabilized to the desired state by utilizing a differentiable or continuous state-feedback controller, which attracts a great many scholars to investigate the tracking control for NMRs [10][11][12][13][14][15]. In Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to stabilise the (11) and using the terminal sliding variable as (12), the supertwisting algorithm can be designed as…”
Section: B X1(t ) and X2(t ) Stabilization'smentioning
confidence: 99%