1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf01212825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite total cross-sections in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics

Abstract: Abstract. We present a simple geometric method for estimating total crosssections in two-body and more generally two cluster scattering. We discuss a variety of aspects of total cross-sections including large coupling constant behavior.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lemma is verified in almost the same way as in the proof of Theorem A. 1.1 of [4]. We give only a sketch for the proof.…”
Section: If We Writementioning
confidence: 67%
“…The lemma is verified in almost the same way as in the proof of Theorem A. 1.1 of [4]. We give only a sketch for the proof.…”
Section: If We Writementioning
confidence: 67%
“…These results [7] are summarized under the rubric of dilation analytic operators, of which the N-particle Coulomb problems are a special case. This theory of dilatation analyticity has, since, taken on a life of its own [8], quite independently of the asymptotic completeness question, which was eventually resolved (positively) by Enss [9] using quite different methods. The basic tool of dilatation analyticity is the use of complex scale transformations, wherein interparticle distances are scaled as r * reie, 8 being a (possible complex) rotation angle in the present discussion, leading to the method also being referred to as the method of complex scale transformations, giving a clear connection to the much older use of "real" scale transformations of atomic coordinates as used, say, by Hylleraas.…”
Section: Origins Of Complex Scalingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand one can derive a bound like gex for large g, where ex depends on the rate of decay of the potential at infinity [38]. On the other hand one can derive a bound like gex for large g, where ex depends on the rate of decay of the potential at infinity [38].…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%