1969
DOI: 10.1063/1.1664779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Transformations and Basis States of SU(n)

Abstract: A convenient parameterization for finite transformations of SU(n) is developed which explicitly exhibits the special unitary subgroups. This is also used to parameterize the defining space. Higher-dimensional representations are discussed. The question of which representations carry the trivial representation of SU(n − 1) is considered, as well as the parameterization of these states. Application is made to the transformations and basis states of SU(3).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with the result of Holland [18] but is determined only up to normalization. The normalization is determined by having dV = 1.…”
Section: Iii2 Invariant Volume Elementsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This agrees with the result of Holland [18] but is determined only up to normalization. The normalization is determined by having dV = 1.…”
Section: Iii2 Invariant Volume Elementsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One way is to take an arbitrary A E SU (3) This agrees with the result of Holland [7]. This is determined only up to a constant factor since the normalization is determined by setting J d V = 1.…”
Section: Invariant Volume Elementsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Similarly, we define the chromofield strength tensor 118) where V P is the plaquette variable for the restricted field (link variable) V , W V and L V represent respectively the Wilson loop operator and the Schwinger line constructed from the restricted field (link variable) V .…”
Section: Chromoelectric Field and Flux Tube Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%