2017
DOI: 10.1111/2047-8852.12170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finland has a strong media sector with a high media circulation and trust in mainstream media (Newman et al, 2017). While political polarisation has been increasing, the level is still low in cross-national studies (Palonen, 2017). Furthermore, the media ecosystem is not extensively market-driven and is supported by the state in various ways such as laws for protecting press freedom, press subsidies and a strong public-service broadcasting system (Hallin et al, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finland has a strong media sector with a high media circulation and trust in mainstream media (Newman et al, 2017). While political polarisation has been increasing, the level is still low in cross-national studies (Palonen, 2017). Furthermore, the media ecosystem is not extensively market-driven and is supported by the state in various ways such as laws for protecting press freedom, press subsidies and a strong public-service broadcasting system (Hallin et al, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, nationalism-populism and political polarisation, although historically low, have seen rapid growth, most recently in response to the 2015 spike in asylum seekers (e.g. Bengtsson et al, 2014; Palonen, 2017). Third, the main language of 90% of people in Finland is Finnish, which is not spoken in any other country.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, there exist four political issues that serve to divide the public: support for traditional values, cultural and social diversity, economic freedom, and economic equality [e.g., 110]. Still, these issues do not typically form strong dividing lines, since citizens can at the same time support economic freedom and economic equality [83,101,102,110]. However, through analysis of voters' responses to attitude questions, each of the parties can be clearly distinguished (Figure 1) even when there is an overall trend of declining party identification [25].…”
Section: Research Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%