2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04079.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fire‐adapted traits of Pinus arose in the fiery Cretaceous

Abstract: Summary The mapping of functional traits onto chronograms is an emerging approach for the identification of how agents of natural selection have shaped the evolution of organisms. Recent research has reported fire‐dependent traits appearing among flowering plants from 60 million yr ago (Ma). Although there are many records of fossil charcoal in the Cretaceous (65–145 Ma), evidence of fire‐dependent traits evolving in that period is lacking. We link the evolutionary trajectories for five fire‐adapted traits in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
290
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(299 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(170 reference statements)
7
290
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Functional trait analysis in pines shows that thick bark is always associated with fireadapted pines with fire-tolerater strategies and lacking in species adapted to stresses of extreme cold or aridity or to crown fire regimes (Keeley and Zedler 1998). Ancestral trait reconstruction supports a Cretaceous origin for this trait, strongly implying that fire adaptation was already an important driver of pine evolution at this time (He et al 2012). Angiosperms at this time were rapidly diversifying into mostly fast growing weedy species (Wing and Boucher 1998), and it is possible this contributed to fuel continuity that enhanced fire spread (Bond and Scott 2010).…”
Section: Mesozoic Origin and Diversificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Functional trait analysis in pines shows that thick bark is always associated with fireadapted pines with fire-tolerater strategies and lacking in species adapted to stresses of extreme cold or aridity or to crown fire regimes (Keeley and Zedler 1998). Ancestral trait reconstruction supports a Cretaceous origin for this trait, strongly implying that fire adaptation was already an important driver of pine evolution at this time (He et al 2012). Angiosperms at this time were rapidly diversifying into mostly fast growing weedy species (Wing and Boucher 1998), and it is possible this contributed to fuel continuity that enhanced fire spread (Bond and Scott 2010).…”
Section: Mesozoic Origin and Diversificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the mid-Cretaceous, both the fossil record (Millar 1998) and molecular phylogenies He et al 2012) show Pinus split into subgenera Strobus and Pinus. These have largely followed very different adaptive trajectories: the former subgenus to abiotically stressful conditions and the latter into fire-prone landscapes.…”
Section: Mesozoic Origin and Diversificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wildfires were a common feature of the Cretaceous landscape based on the high abundances of fossil charcoals found in rocks from this period (Belcher et al 2005;Glasspool & Scott 2010;Brown et al 2012). Moreover, high fire frequencies in the Cretaceous appear to have driven plant adaptations to fire at this time; for example, Pinus has been shown to evolve the fire-adaptive traits of thick bark and serotinous cones between 129 and 89 Ma (He et al 2012), implying that some plants were becoming increasingly adapted to fire throughout this period. Our experimental results imply that surface fires could have been ignited in areas where litter was seasonally dry, but that at proximal and intermediate distances from the impact direct ignition of canopy fuels was unlikely.…”
Section: Wildfires and Disruption To Earth's Flora At The K-pg Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have linked morphological traits to post-fire survival; thicker bark, deep rooting depth, and a high, open tree crown have all been identified as characteristics that increase relative fire resistance of a tree (Fischer and Bradley, 1987;Harrington, 2013;He et al, 2012;Keeley, 2012;Midgley et al, 2011;Ryan and Reinhardt, 1988;Starker, 20 1934;VanderWeide and Hartnett, 2011). However, many studies assume a binary response regarding fire impacts on vegetation: either mortality (immediate or delayed) or no physiological effect .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%